BITCOIN OWNER TRACK RECORDS
Who has done best and worst owning Bitcoin?
Anonymous owners ranked by money made and by rate of return, with a count of everyone who was in the running.
An owner here is a bundle of addresses the chain's own evidence links together, not a person and not an account. One person may show up as several owners, and one owner may be a company. Read every row as a group of addresses, never as a headcount of people.
| # | Owner | Money made or lost | Rate of return | Days they sold | Share of those days that ended ahead | Share of their sales we could price | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | owner-9155b99a827c | +$1.8B | +445.6% | 31 | 97% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 2 | owner-259377d7c743 | +$1.7B | +210.4% | 13 | 92% | 100% | Last seen buying |
| 3 | owner-238de8549e6c | +$1.3B | +304.6% | 11 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 4 | owner-76200d17f86c | +$1.2B | +664.2% | 8 | 88% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 5 | owner-91c891ec09da | +$1.1B | +1,608% | 13 | 69% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 6 | owner-8ac454f98117 | +$1.0B | +284.4% | 13 | 92% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 7 | owner-b352c6ac8b6c | +$1.0B | +214.0% | 28 | 96% | 100% | Last seen buying |
| 8 | owner-7d4cd784b2d4 | +$1.0B | +581.3% | 7 | 86% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 9 | owner-bb1e0e3fe40e | +$1.0B | +1,131% | 5 | 80% | 100% | Last seen buying |
| 10 | owner-0ab65c9ef5b9 | +$924M | +291.7% | 8 | 88% | 100% | Last seen buying |
On the lower table, number one is the worst record, not the best.
| # | Owner | Money made or lost | Rate of return | Days they sold | Share of those days that ended ahead | Share of their sales we could price | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | owner-78d1970087d0 | −$1.1B | −6.5% | 157 | 58% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 2 | owner-789340dc3881 | −$1.0B | −36.9% | 83 | 46% | 100% | Last seen buying |
| 3 | owner-6c3312977ea7 | −$384M | −11.6% | 43 | 26% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 4 | owner-ca680f4d641a | −$330M | −4.8% | 39 | 46% | 100% | Last seen holding steady |
| 5 | owner-5617a91e0279 | −$241M | −57.4% | 16 | 13% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 6 | owner-34aa84959217 | −$221M | −49.9% | 491 | 54% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 7 | owner-a10503d31be1 | −$169M | −62.1% | 7 | 0% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 8 | owner-20500e5fe479 | −$166M | −3.3% | 186 | 26% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 9 | owner-563aa9770f02 | −$154M | −17.2% | 8 | 25% | 100% | Last seen holding steady |
| 10 | owner-e2594e815d33 | −$139M | −6.5% | 49 | 16% | 100% | Last seen buying |
| # | Owner | Money made or lost | Rate of return | Days they sold | Share of those days that ended ahead | Share of their sales we could price | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | owner-6c53c039e101 | +$4M | +46,782,707% | 6 | 83% | 99% | Last seen selling |
| 2 | owner-174c6b89c861 | +$1M | +7,156,356% | 5 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 3 | owner-d14df6d269c4 | +$3M | +4,152,974% | 8 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 4 | owner-d0350b7ed842 | +$13M | +4,138,091% | 10 | 100% | 92% | Last seen selling |
| 5 | owner-e82558cfec16 | +$10M | +3,492,185% | 5 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 6 | owner-098708d1d895 | +$1M | +2,547,951% | 8 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 7 | owner-fdbdba0c42d4 | +$665K | +2,244,803% | 19 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 8 | owner-9132c3470d2f | +$4M | +1,830,343% | 13 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 9 | owner-0c7ce528f985 | +$2M | +1,637,176% | 13 | 100% | 100% | Last seen holding steady |
| 10 | owner-c9080a4d904f | +$12M | +1,585,974% | 14 | 100% | 100% | Last seen selling |
On the lower table, number one is the worst record, not the best.
| # | Owner | Money made or lost | Rate of return | Days they sold | Share of those days that ended ahead | Share of their sales we could price | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | owner-3ab9f49ad768 | −$385K | −79.1% | 8 | 13% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 2 | owner-55c58591bd55 | −$3M | −77.4% | 14 | 14% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 3 | owner-21fbd6f10c67 | −$302K | −76.5% | 5 | 0% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 4 | owner-389ae3e8341b | −$496K | −76.5% | 12 | 0% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 5 | owner-ee9ce3e21312 | −$700K | −76.2% | 34 | 3% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 6 | owner-45808e34643a | −$36K | −75.6% | 7 | 0% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 7 | owner-19544b49d70b | −$8M | −74.8% | 5 | 0% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 8 | owner-b069fffe82da | −$147K | −74.1% | 5 | 20% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 9 | owner-1ee1fdff7ea7 | −$622K | −73.9% | 7 | 14% | 100% | Last seen selling |
| 10 | owner-e73a6dc1996f | −$4M | −73.7% | 5 | 20% | 100% | Last seen selling |
A negative figure is money lost. The colour follows the number, not the table it sits in.
How many owners are even in the running?
89,053,965owners who have ever soldEvery owner on the chain that has parted with a coin at least once.2,079,199ranked by money madeCleared the bar for a long enough, well enough priced record.925,808ranked by rate of returnA higher bar, because a percentage on a tiny sale means nothing.Everyone else fell short of at least one rule. The next two steps show who got ranked, and then exactly which rules the rest missed.
Who made the most money, and who lost the most?
The best record made $1.79 billion.Out of 89,053,965 owners who have ever sold anything, 2,079,199 cleared the bar. The worst lost $1.14 billion.
Realised results over the period we can observe, up to August 17, 2026. Past outcomes, not a forecast and not advice.
Who was left out, and why?
86,974,766 owners were left out of the money ranking. Here is what they missed.
An owner is counted against every rule it misses, so these numbers add up to more than the number of owners left out. The honest figure for that is 89,053,965 minus 2,079,199.
- Sold on fewer than five days84,703,886 owners
- Less than six months between first sale and last activity84,444,805 owners
- Too much of what they sold could not be matched to what they paid3,710 owners
- An exchange or a custodian1,314 owners
Exchanges and custodians are excluded outright. An exchange's gains are its customers' gains, and no amount of activity changes that.
What are these owners doing now?
6last seen buying31last seen selling3last seen holding steady0not enough history to sayThis counts every owner who appears on a ranking above, 40 in all, counted once even where the same owner places twice. It is a read on those rankings and nothing wider, not on the 89,053,965 owners in the population.
Last seen is the operative word. For a quiet owner the last time they moved anything can be years ago, so nobody here is described as doing something today.
What does this mean for you?
The useful thing on this page is not the top row. It is the shape of the bar you have to clear to get there. An owner needs at least half a year between their first sale and their last activity, at least five separate selling days, and enough of their selling matched to what they paid, before we will rank them at all. Those rules together leave out almost everybody, which tells you something about how rare a long, finished, measurable Bitcoin record actually is.
The second useful thing is what is missing. Nothing here counts coins somebody still holds. A person sitting on an enormous gain they have never sold appears nowhere on this page, because a coin that has not been sold has no result yet. So read this as a record of finished decisions, by anonymous groups of addresses, over a period we could observe. It is not a forecast, it is not a strategy, and it is not advice.
What to watch from here
- The best record made $1.79 billion and the worst lost $1.14 billion. Both are finished results, not open positions.
- 2,079,199 owners out of 89,053,965 cleared the bar. If that ratio grows over the years, more of Bitcoin's history is becoming measurable.
- The rate of return board asks for at least ten thousand dollars of sales, which is why it ranks fewer owners than the money board does.
Understanding Bitcoin Owner Track Records
Where it stands today
Bitcoin Owner Track Records is 2,079,199 owners ranked as of .
What an owner means here. An owner is a bundle of addresses that the chain's own evidence links together, because at some point they were all spent from in one transaction. It is not a person and it is not an account. One person can show up as several owners, and one owner can be a company with thousands of customers behind it. Read every row as a group of addresses, never as a headcount of people.
How we measure a track record. For every owner we walk their whole history on our own copy of the chain, day by day, matching the coins they sold against what those coins cost them. A day on which an owner sold anything counts once, whatever happened inside it. So the figure we call days they sold is exactly that, a count of days, and nobody can manufacture a longer record by splitting one sale across five transactions. The share of days that ended ahead is measured the same way, one verdict per day, and a day whose selling we could not price can never count as a win.
What the rate of return does and does not include. It compares an owner's profit against what the coins they sold originally cost, not against everything they hold. Coins they still hold count for nothing in it, because a coin that has not been sold has no result yet. That is deliberate. It keeps the number to things that actually finished, and it means a large gain sitting untouched in a wallet will never appear on this page.
Who gets ranked, and who does not. To appear at all, an owner needs at least five separate selling days, at least 180 days between their first sale and the last time they were active, and at least 80% of what they sold matched to what they paid for it. Ranking by rate of return also asks for at least ten thousand dollars of sales, so five dollars turning into fifty cannot outrank ten million turning into fifteen. Exchanges and custodians do not belong on a list like this, because an exchange's gains belong to its customers rather than to the exchange. Where our own evidence identifies one, it is left out and counted among the owners who did not rank, and the page says on the day whether any were found.
Why the exclusion counts do not add up. An owner is counted against every rule it misses, so someone who sold on two days and could not be priced appears on two of those lines. Adding the lines together would count them twice. The honest number for how many owners were left out is the number considered minus the number ranked, and both of those are on the page.
Why there are no names. Each owner carries a short code that we generate with a private key of our own, and the same owner keeps the same code from one day to the next so a row can be followed over time. The code cannot be turned back into addresses, by us or by anyone reading the page, and there is no page anywhere to look one up on. That is the point. We publish track records, we do not identify anybody.
What this page is not. Every figure here already happened, to somebody else, over a stretch of time we could observe. The best row is one anonymous owner's finished history, not a method you can copy, and a bad row is not a warning about anything you are doing. This is a record, not a recommendation, and nothing on it is advice.